The rapid growth of technology has created new opportunities for criminals to commit crimes

Oct 13, 2025 by leolavanderia.com.br 54 views

Proof of Criminal Acts of Computer Access and/or Electronic Systems Illegally in the Ficti Taxi Online Order Based on Law No. 19 of 2016

The Rise of Cybercrime in Indonesia

The development of crime in the field of information and electronic transactions in Indonesia is increasing, both in terms of number and complexity. The rapid growth of technology has created new opportunities for criminals to commit crimes, and one form of crime is a crime of computer access and electronic system illegally, especially in the context of online taxi fictitious orders. The case in the spotlight is the decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Mdn, where the defendant Amiruddin Mendrofa was found guilty of taking the action based on a number of electronic evidence submitted at the trial.

Legal Regulation of Computer Access Crimes

Crimes relating to information and electronic transactions in Indonesia are regulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 which is a change of Law No. 11 of 2008. The law provides a comprehensive framework for regulating electronic transactions and protecting consumers. Articles 27 to Article 37 include various prohibited acts, while Article 45 to Article 52 formulates sanctions for violators. One of the challenges in law enforcement related to this criminal offense is the recognition and regulation of electronic evidence.

The Importance of Electronic Evidence

Although Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code explains the valid evidence, the regulation on electronic evidence is not explicitly found in the Criminal Procedure Code. The lack of clear regulation on electronic evidence has created a challenge for law enforcement officials. As a solution, Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No. 19 of 2016 states that electronic information and/or electronic documents can be used as valid evidence. This is important in the context of justice, where electronic evidence is often the key in proving criminal acts, especially in the current digital era.

Case Study: Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN

In Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN, the panel of judges considers a number of electronic evidence submitted. The case highlights the importance of electronic evidence in proving criminal acts. Defendant Amiruddin Mendrofa was proven to have committed a crime of computer access and/or electronic system illegally by utilizing fictitious orders on online taxi services. The elements considered in the decision referring to Article 30 paragraph (3) jo Article 46 paragraph (3) of Law No. 19 of 2016 and Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code 1. This confirms that, although the existing legal regulations can be a foundation, challenges related to proof and validity of electronic evidence remain.

The Need for Stronger Policy and Education

This case shows that although regulations have been established, its implementation in the field often faces various problems. There is a need for a stronger policy and better understanding of electronic evidence among law enforcers. Education and training on information technology and electronic transactions to law enforcement officials and lawyers need to be done in order to face this more complex crime.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the proof of criminal acts of computer access and electronic systems illegally, especially in online taxi fictional orders, requires a deep understanding of electronic evidence. In the context of existing regulations, proper and accurate proof is the key to effectively enforcing the law in the digital world. The case study highlights the importance of electronic evidence in proving criminal acts and the need for stronger policy and education to face this more complex crime.

Recommendations

The government should establish a stronger policy on electronic evidence and provide education and training to law enforcement officials and lawyers.
The law enforcement officials should have a better understanding of electronic evidence and its importance in proving criminal acts.
The use of electronic evidence should be encouraged in the court of law to ensure justice is served.

Future Research Directions

The study of electronic evidence and its importance in proving criminal acts.
The development of a stronger policy on electronic evidence.
The education and training of law enforcement officials and lawyers on information technology and electronic transactions.

References

Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law No.11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.
Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN.
Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No. 19 of 2016.

Keywords

Computer access crimes
Electronic evidence
Law No. 19 of 2016
Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN
Online taxi fictitious orders
Electronic transactions
Information technology
Law enforcement officials
Lawyers
Education and training
Policy and regulation
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Proof of Criminal Acts of Computer Access and/or Electronic Systems Illegally in the Ficti Taxi Online Order Based on Law No. 19 of 2016

Q: What is the main purpose of Law No. 19 of 2016?

A: The main purpose of Law No. 19 of 2016 is to regulate electronic transactions and protect consumers. The law provides a comprehensive framework for regulating electronic transactions and protecting consumers.

Q: What are the prohibited acts mentioned in Law No. 19 of 2016?

A: The prohibited acts mentioned in Law No. 19 of 2016 include various acts such as hacking, unauthorized access, and data theft. Articles 27 to Article 37 of the law include various prohibited acts.

Q: What is the significance of electronic evidence in proving criminal acts?

A: Electronic evidence is often the key in proving criminal acts, especially in the current digital era. The use of electronic evidence is encouraged in the court of law to ensure justice is served.

Q: What is the importance of education and training on information technology and electronic transactions?

A: Education and training on information technology and electronic transactions are essential for law enforcement officials and lawyers to face this more complex crime. The government should establish a stronger policy on electronic evidence and provide education and training to law enforcement officials and lawyers.

Q: What is the role of law enforcement officials in proving criminal acts?

A: Law enforcement officials have a crucial role in proving criminal acts by collecting and analyzing electronic evidence. They should have a better understanding of electronic evidence and its importance in proving criminal acts.

Q: What is the significance of the case study: Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN?

A: The case study highlights the importance of electronic evidence in proving criminal acts. The case shows that although regulations have been established, its implementation in the field often faces various problems.

Q: What are the recommendations for the government and law enforcement officials?

A: The government should establish a stronger policy on electronic evidence and provide education and training to law enforcement officials and lawyers. Law enforcement officials should have a better understanding of electronic evidence and its importance in proving criminal acts.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: The study of electronic evidence and its importance in proving criminal acts, the development of a stronger policy on electronic evidence, and the education and training of law enforcement officials and lawyers on information technology and electronic transactions.

Q: What are the references used in this article?

A: Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law No.11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN, Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law No. 19 of 2016.

Q: What are the keywords used in this article?

A: Computer access crimes, electronic evidence, Law No. 19 of 2016, Decision No. 1502/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.MDN, online taxi fictitious orders, electronic transactions, information technology, law enforcement officials, lawyers, education and training, policy and regulation.