The Effect of Profitability and Company Age on Audit Delay with Company Size as a Moderating Variable

Oct 13, 2025 by leolavanderia.com.br 145 views

The Effect of Profitability and Company Age on Audit Delay with Company Size as a Moderating Variable

Introduction

In today's business world, transparency and reliability of financial statements are crucial for maintaining trust among stakeholders. However, audit delays can often interfere with this trust, leading to a loss of confidence in the report. As a result, understanding the factors that contribute to audit delays is essential for companies and auditors alike. This study aims to analyze the effect of profitability and company age on audit delay, with company size as a moderating variable. The research focuses on food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2011-2014 period.

Background

The auditor plays a vital role in maintaining the transparency and reliability of a company's financial statements. However, audit delays can occur due to various reasons, including the complexity of the company's financial statements, the auditor's workload, and the company's operational complexity. Understanding the factors that contribute to audit delays is essential for companies and auditors to minimize the delay and maintain trust in the report.

Methodology

To measure profitability, a return on assets (ROA) ratio is used. The age of the company is calculated from the year of its establishment to the year of observation. The delay audit is measured by the difference between the end of the company's financial year and the date of the audit report is received. The company size is assessed based on total assets and expressed in the form of natural logarithms (LN Total Asset).

This study uses multiple regression analysis methods and regression analysis with moderate variables to analyze the data. The data taken consisted of 40 samples originating from 10 companies over 4 years of research.

Results

The results of this study show that simultaneously, profitability and age of the company have a positive and significant influence on the audit delay. However, when viewed from partial influence, only the age of the company is proven to have a positive and significant influence on the audit delay, while profitability does not show a significant effect.

Furthermore, the analysis also shows that the company's size cannot moderate the relationship between profitability and the age of the company to the audit delay. This means that regardless of company size, the relationship between profitability and the age of the company and the delay audit remains unchanged.

Further Analysis

From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the company's age has a more dominant role in determining audit delay than profitability. Older companies tend to have a more mature system and process, but at the same time, it can also face greater challenges in renewing the system in dealing with the demands of financial statements that continue to develop.

Conversely, profitability that has no significant effect on the audit delay shows that the auditor may not prioritize financial ratios in audit risk evaluation even though the company has good profit. This suggests that auditors may focus on other factors that are more influential, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management.

Another interesting discovery is that the size of the company, measured by total assets, does not have an impact of modernizing in the relationship of profitability and the age of the company on the audit delay. This can be understood that the auditor might focus on other factors that are more influential, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management.

Conclusion

This study provides important insights for stakeholders in the food and beverage industry, especially in terms of the importance of paying attention to the age of the company in minimizing the audit delay. Companies with good management and adequate supporting systems must strive to understand and overcome the negative effects that may originate from audit delays.

By understanding this relationship, companies can manage stakeholder expectations and increase accountability in their financial statements. This study highlights the need for companies to focus on developing a more mature system and process, while also prioritizing risk management and operational complexity.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Companies should prioritize developing a more mature system and process to minimize audit delays.
Auditors should focus on other factors that are more influential, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management.
Companies should strive to understand and overcome the negative effects that may originate from audit delays.
Stakeholders should pay attention to the age of the company in minimizing the audit delay.

Limitations

This study has several limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the study only focuses on food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2011-2014 period. Secondly, the study uses a sample size of 40 samples originating from 10 companies over 4 years of research. Finally, the study only analyzes the effect of profitability and company age on audit delay, with company size as a moderating variable.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on exploring other factors that contribute to audit delays, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management. Additionally, future research should aim to replicate this study using a larger sample size and a longer research period.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides important insights for stakeholders in the food and beverage industry, especially in terms of the importance of paying attention to the age of the company in minimizing the audit delay. By understanding this relationship, companies can manage stakeholder expectations and increase accountability in their financial statements.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Effect of Profitability and Company Age on Audit Delay with Company Size as a Moderating Variable

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the effect of profitability and company age on audit delay, with company size as a moderating variable.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study is significant because it provides important insights for stakeholders in the food and beverage industry, especially in terms of the importance of paying attention to the age of the company in minimizing the audit delay.

Q: What is the methodology used in this study?

A: The methodology used in this study includes multiple regression analysis methods and regression analysis with moderate variables.

Q: What is the sample size of this study?

A: The sample size of this study is 40 samples originating from 10 companies over 4 years of research.

Q: What is the main finding of this study?

A: The main finding of this study is that the company's age has a more dominant role in determining audit delay than profitability.

Q: What is the implication of this study?

A: The implication of this study is that companies with good management and adequate supporting systems must strive to understand and overcome the negative effects that may originate from audit delays.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include the fact that it only focuses on food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2011-2014 period, and the sample size is relatively small.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should focus on exploring other factors that contribute to audit delays, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: The recommendations of this study include:

Companies should prioritize developing a more mature system and process to minimize audit delays.
Auditors should focus on other factors that are more influential, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management.
Companies should strive to understand and overcome the negative effects that may originate from audit delays.
Stakeholders should pay attention to the age of the company in minimizing the audit delay.

Q: What are the implications for practice?

A: The implications for practice are that companies should prioritize developing a more mature system and process to minimize audit delays, and auditors should focus on other factors that are more influential, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management.

Q: What are the implications for policy?

A: The implications for policy are that policymakers should consider the importance of paying attention to the age of the company in minimizing the audit delay, and should develop policies that support the development of a more mature system and process in companies.

Q: What are the implications for future research?

A: The implications for future research are that researchers should focus on exploring other factors that contribute to audit delays, such as the company's operational complexity or better risk management, and should aim to replicate this study using a larger sample size and a longer research period.